'iPhone 17 Air' Rumored to Start at $899 With Surprisingly Good Battery Life, Camera Control, and More

by
Apple's WWDC 2025 Keynote: Follow along with our live blog.

Bloomberg's Mark Gurman today shared some new details about the rumored iPhone 17 Air.

iPhone 17 Air Size Feature
In his Power On newsletter, Gurman said he was told that the device may start at roughly $899 in the U.S., which means that it would occupy the same price point as the iPhone 16 Plus. This would make sense, as it has been widely rumored that the Air model will take over the Plus model's spot in the iPhone lineup going forward.

Despite its rumored ultra-thin and lightweight design, Gurman said the iPhone 17 Air will provide battery life that is "on par with current iPhones," although he did not mention any specific models. Presumably, this means that the device's battery life will be equal to the lowest-end iPhone 16 model, at a minimum. That would be surprisingly good.

Gurman said Apple has made hardware and software optimizations to make the iPhone 17 Air more power efficient. There are three rumored features for the iPhone 17 Air that should contribute to the device offering longer battery life than one might have imagined, including a higher-density battery, Apple's power-efficient C1 modem, and the lack of an Ultra Wide camera providing more internal space for a larger battery.

Gurman said the iPhone 17 Air will be equipped with the Camera Control button that debuted on all iPhone 16 models last year. This is the first time that this feature has been rumored for the device. The button provides quick access to the camera and related settings, but some people find it to be a nuisance and disable it.

He also revealed that the iPhone 17 Air's bezels around the screen will apparently be around as thin as the ones on the iPhone 16 Pro models.

A few other iPhone 17 Air specifications that he mentioned had already been rumored previously, including a 6.6-inch display with 120Hz ProMotion support, a Dynamic Island, a standard A19 chip instead of an A19 Pro chip, a single 48-megapixel rear camera, the C1 modem, and the lack of a physical SIM card slot seemingly worldwide.

Unsurprisingly, look for the iPhone 17 Air to launch in September this year.

Related Roundup: iPhone 17 Air
Tag: Mark Gurman

Popular Stories

General Apps Messages Redux

iOS 26: New Messages and Phone App Features Leaked Ahead of WWDC

Friday June 6, 2025 7:27 am PDT by
Apple is planning to announce several new features for the Messages and Phone apps on iOS 26, according to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman. In a lengthy report outlining his WWDC 2025 expectations today, Gurman said that the two main changes in the Messages app will be the ability to create polls, as well as the option to set a background image within a conversation. 9to5Mac was first to report...
Read Full Article • 46 comments
iPhone 17 Air Size Feature

'iPhone 17 Air' Launching Later This Year With These 17 New Features

Friday June 6, 2025 6:17 am PDT by
While the so-called "iPhone 17 Air" is not expected to launch until September, there are already plenty of rumors about the ultra-thin device. Overall, the iPhone 17 Air sounds like a mixed bag. While the device is expected to have an impressively thin and light design, rumors indicate it will have some compromises compared to iPhone 17 Pro models, including worse battery life, only a single ...
Read Full Article • 76 comments
iOS 26 white

iOS 26's Digital Glass Design: Home Screen Widgets, Camera, and More

Friday June 6, 2025 8:32 am PDT by
In a lengthy report outlining his WWDC 2025 expectations today, Bloomberg's Mark Gurman shared more details about iOS 26's rumored new design. According to Gurman, iOS 26 will feature a "digital glass" design inspired by visionOS, the operating system for Apple's Vision Pro headset. That is a well-known rumor by now, but he goes on to provide some more specific details, as listed below:There ...
Read Full Article • 64 comments
macOS Tahoe Render

macOS Tahoe Might Support One Fewer Mac Than Previously Rumored

Saturday June 7, 2025 5:27 am PDT by
macOS 26 will drop support for several older Intel-based Mac models currently compatible with macOS Sequoia, according to a private account on X with a proven track record of leaking information about Apple's software platforms. macOS 26 will be compatible with the following Mac models, the account said:MacBook Air (M1 and later) MacBook Pro (2019 and later) iMac (2020 and later) Mac...
Read Full Article • 160 comments
AirTag Backpack

New AirTag With Three Upgrades is 'Nearly Ready' to Launch

Sunday June 8, 2025 11:44 am PDT by
Apple's long-rumored AirTag 2 might be coming soon. In his Power On newsletter today, Bloomberg's Mark Gurman briefly mentioned that a new AirTag is "nearly ready" to launch. Last year, he said that it would be released around the middle of 2025, and the midpoint of the year is just a few weeks away. "The new AirTag is nearly ready, having been prepared for launch over the past several...
Read Full Article • 42 comments

Top Rated Comments

ThisIsMike Avatar
ThisIsMike
12 weeks ago

This product makes zero sense to me. People who want a big screen don’t care how thin the device is. It’s also lacking a lot compared to the Pro models yet commands a premium price.
Thankfully this is the internet, where it's completely acceptable to disagree with people, as it is in real life. lol, because I'm going to say you are incorrect, apologies.

First of all this - "People who want a big screen don’t care how thin the device is" is COMPLETELY wrong. And I know, because I'm one of the people you believe don't exist. This is the ONLY way I would consider a phone with a big screen. I would love a phone with a huge screen, but I have no interest in having a phone with the thickness and weight of an iPhone plus or pro max bulging out in my pocket, constantly making its presence known. I find it to be ridiculously large and heavy, and I would be invariably aware of it on my person. No thanks. I've said for years that I wouldn't consider a phone like that unless they made it thin and light, which - guess what - is exactly what they've done here. This is the first large phone I would at least CONSIDER buying.

I also don't think it's a premium price. The pro models are premium-priced. This, to me, doesn't seem that bad. I don't think it's *cheap,* but I don't think it's outrageous.

I actually believe this phone has the potential to be surprise hit for Apple and a huge seller. BUT, that said, I'm not clairvoyant, and I could be wrong. Maybe this won't hold any allure. Maybe I'm the ONLY one who feels this way about huge-donkey phones. Maybe this is kind of like the iPhone mini - appealing to some who are vocal, but not enough people in real life will buy it. We'll see. But I'm still leaning towards surprise hit.

Until it's not. ?
Score: 9 Votes (Like | Disagree)
bryo Avatar
bryo
12 weeks ago
Single speaker and no stereo sound is really unappealing to me. Otherwise interesting, I could see this model being popular because of the new design.
Score: 8 Votes (Like | Disagree)
victorvictoria Avatar
victorvictoria
12 weeks ago

Single speaker and no stereo sound is really unappealing to me. Otherwise interesting, I could see this model being popular because of the new design.
You're concerned about stereo sound output from a phone? The sound from the built-in speakers is so bad and the speakes are so close together, that stereo is redundant. Get some AirPods! Cast to a TV or your stereo system!
Score: 8 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Vctr Avatar
Vctr
12 weeks ago
Let's be honest here ... many of us who frequent this site are either Pro or Pro Max users. So the fact that none of us find this product to be super compelling is exactly what Apple wants (e.g. they want us to continue buying Pro or Pro Max phones). The last thing Apple wants us to do is to "step down" our purchase and buy a cheaper phone

This phone is designed to upsell customers who are considering the iPhone 17 ... which I can totally see happening with the all new design. Let's keep in mind that these folks don't care as much about performance or cameras
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)
upthetoffees Avatar
upthetoffees
12 weeks ago
Its still crazy these prices, cant believe i spent 1400 (eur!!) on my last one
Score: 5 Votes (Like | Disagree)
ThailandToo Avatar
ThailandToo
12 weeks ago

Let's be honest here ... many of us who frequent this site are either Pro or Pro Max users. So the fact that none of us find this product to be super compelling is exactly what Apple wants (e.g. they want us to continue buying Pro or Pro Max phones). The last thing Apple wants us to do is to "step down" our purchase and buy a cheaper phone

This phone is designed to upsell customers who are considering the iPhone 17 ... which I can totally see happening with the all new design. Let's keep in mind that these folks don't care as much about performance or cameras
I sort of disagree here. What I think Apple wants is to make the most money. So, I assume they will have the same storage upgrades as the Pro models. That will ensure the maximum profits. I also assume that this is a new design language going forward, and so this is a first-adaptor or early-adaptor technology.

Tim is good at maximizing profits. He has been bad at any new technology, in terms of innovation, and his software understanding is non-existent. But, AAPL wouldn’t be doing this if it didn’t make them a ton of money.

I would be 10x more interested in an iPhone that did three things differently.

1. All screen no-interference display. I don’t care what you have to do take the FaceID, put it under the display or whatever.
2. Remove the camera bumps. I don’t care if the phone is a bit thicker, but I don’t want anything ruining my ability to lay the phone on its back and have it wobble like a toy.
3. Focus on battery life by making the software perfect or as close to the main focus as anything. I mean the focus to remove all the stupid bugs would be a great first step. All the rest is marketing.

I would buy an Air with one camera if it did all these other things in a great way.
Score: 4 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Read All Comments